Sat, 23
18 °C
Sun, 24
20 °C
Mon, 25
20 °C

Fears residents will be forced to pay out if flats fail cladding fire tests

Residents at a block of private apartments in Slough which needs to be tested for potentially dangerous cladding have been told they may have to pay for extra safety measures.

On Tuesday, an email was sent to flat owners at Nova House, in Buckingham Gardens, saying that the seven-storey building could have panels made from aluminium composite.

The site’s managing agents, Ringley Group, said the building’s materials had been prioritised for testing due to the ‘inherent risk of fire escalation’ if the cladding failed fire tests.

Ringley’s email stated: “The government has not set aside money to deal with replacement of materials that are found to be dangerous.

“Reserve funds will need to be assessed and potentially additional monies collected.

“Employing fire wardens 24/7 will increase service charge costs which likewise is funded by owners.”

Richard Venables, 53, who shares an apartment at Nova House, told the Express the email implied residents would have to pay to guarantee their safety.

He said: “Everyone is panicking and we’ve had families move out.

“If we are not willing to pay for it then are we going to have to carry on living in a potentially dangerous building?”

Nationwide tests are being carried out on high-rise blocks for combustible cladding like that used on Grenfell Tower.

Nova House, which has 68 apartments and is believed to house more than 200 people, opened to the public in 2015.

Ringley Group has also told its residents instead of testing a panel from the block itself, it would be sending off a spare panel from the developer.

Richard added: “Why should we trust the results from a spare panel? We want them to test a panel on the building.”

A spokeswoman for the Ringley Group told the Express the cladding used at the apartment block is not the same as that installed at Grenfell Tower but the company was giving it their ‘urgent attention’.

A statement said: “As a precautionary measure, we have arranged for a cladding panel from Nova House to be sent for testing at the Building Research Establishment.

“Nova House does have two fire exits, staff on site, a fire alarm and smoke detectors and a smoke ventilation system. We have also checked with the developer who has confirmed the building meets all building regulations and has been signed off.”

Comments

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on

Characters left: 1500

comment

  • Mark 30

    12:12, 30 June 2017

    Our first home was a flat in a block of 6 with a mix of council tenants. Just as we came to sell the council took a decision to upgrade the roof. Obviously these buildings need regular maintenance, and the job went to the lowest bidder and the cost was made clear to all the residents, about £85k. The contribution expected from myself was upwards of £5k. As a leasehold owner you have to accept these decisions when they come around. We were disappointed with the timing, as we had just gone on the market, but the prospect of having a newly refurbished roof was a bit of a selling point! We ended up selling the property with a retainer that we would pay the bill on completion of the work. I don't know what the council tenants contributions were, I expect less, as that is the point of social housing. But I felt the whole process fair and well communicated. Whilst Local Authorities are constantly 'cash strapped' we should understand that in order for them to maintain the buildings to a standard and carry out work that is necessary for the safety of the residents then the occupiers should all expect to have to contribute. I would expect that process to be dealt with fairly and reasonably from the Authority. Alternatively you could live somewhere else!

    Reply

    Report

    • Unitesecretary01

      17:05, 30 June 2017

      No Mark. If all landlords were hoodwinked when purchasing the property why should they pay. Often these days the building regulations and safety advice given by the fire service is ignored in order to cut costs. It seems the above could be the case at Nova House. Are you a property developer?

      Reply

      Report

Most Shared

Most Commented

Top Ten Articles